Legal Opinion
First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 19, 2002No. 95-518CPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILSON, Judge.
This Winstar-related case is before the Court on “short form”1 cross-motions for partial summary judgment on plaintiffs breach of contract claim. Based on the existence of genuine issues of material fact regarding intent to contract, the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment are DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
This ease is one of approximately 120 cases related to United States v. Winstar Corp., et al., 518 U.S. 839, 116 S.Ct. 2432, 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996). The history of the 1980s’ demise of the savings and loan industry has been extensively detailed in the Supreme…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Red Lake Band v. U.S. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- American Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Commercial Federal Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.