Legal Opinion

Snowden v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 12, 1996No. 84, 1995PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

The defendant-appellant, Ferdell Snowden, also known as Ferdell Harvey (“Snowden”), was tried before a jury in the Superior Court. The jury found Snowden guilty of Reckless Endangering in the First Degree, Possession of a Deadly Weapon During the Commission of a Felony, Unlawful Imprisonment in the Second Degree, Aggravated Act of Intimidation, and Menacing. The jury acquitted Snowden of Criminal Mischief under $500. Snowden was sentenced to be incarcerated for an aggregate of ten years, suspended after four and one-half years for five and one-half years’ probation, to be…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Trump v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. Floudiotis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  5. Stigars v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API