Legal Opinion

Floudiotis v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 6, 1999No. 436, 1997, 443, 1997, 435, 1997, 440, 1997PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this appeal of a joint trial of four co-defendants allegedly involved in an assault and conspiracy, we reverse the judgment of the trial court following a jury verdict against the defendants. We hold, in part, that the trial court committed reversible error in the admission of unfairly prejudicial evidence of marginal relevance against all defendants. This prejudicial evidence included photographs of the defendants’ tee-shirts and tattoos and offensive comments attributed to certain defendants, all of which (in varying degrees) tended to depict the defendants as…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Shelton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  5. Cabrera v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API