Trump v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice.
The principal question before the Court is whether statements in a prosecutor’s jury summation that appeared to vouch for the credibility of a complaining child witness in a criminal sexual misconduct ease constituted plain error requiring reversal of the conviction and sentence. We hold that for improper vouching to constitute plain error: (1) credibility must be a central issue in a close case; and (2) the prosecutor’s comments must be so clear and defense counsel’s failure to object so inexcusable that a trial judge, in the interest of fundamental fairness, has no…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
- United States v. Neal T. Roberts and James Albert RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Kurzmann v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Ayers v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- Swan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.