Legal Opinion

Trump v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 9, 2000No. 534, 1998PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice.

The principal question before the Court is whether statements in a prosecutor’s jury summation that appeared to vouch for the credibility of a complaining child witness in a criminal sexual misconduct ease constituted plain error requiring reversal of the conviction and sentence. We hold that for improper vouching to constitute plain error: (1) credibility must be a central issue in a close case; and (2) the prosecutor’s comments must be so clear and defense counsel’s failure to object so inexcusable that a trial judge, in the interest of fundamental fairness, has no…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  5. United States v. Neal T. Roberts and James Albert RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Kurzmann v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  3. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. Ayers v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  5. Swan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API