Deacero S.A.P.I. de C v. v. United States

Court No. 12-00345 Page 2 Goldberg, Senior Judge: This case has ricocheted between the court and the Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the Department”) since 2012. The matter now returns here following a second remand, which asked Commerce whether it would reconsider a finding supporting its negative circumvention decision from the first remand. In the end, the Department chose not to revisit the finding in question. Thus substantial evidence remains on the record to buttress Commerce’s decision not to subject plaintiffs’ 4.75 millimeter (“mm”) wire rod to antidumping duties. The court…