Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of Hennepin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 5, 1993No. C7-92-518, C6-92-543 and C7-92-566PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDEBRING, Justice.
This case arises out of the proposed demolition of the Minneapolis National Guard Armory (“Armory”). Hennepin County (“the County”) has purchased the Armory site in order to demolish the building to allow for the construction of a high-rise public safety facility (“PSF” or “jail”).
In September 1990, the State Historic Preservation Officer, Nina Archabal (Ar-chabal), brought a declaratory action, alleging a violation of the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act, Minn.Stat., ch. 116B (“MERA”) and seeking to permanently enjoin the County from “demolishing, destroying or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Stop H-3 Ass'n v. DoleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- COUNTY OF FREEBORN BY TUVESON v. BrysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Iron Rangers for Responsible Ridge Action v. Iron Range ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Schaller v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Fort Snelling State Park Ass'n v. Minneapolis Park & Recreation BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State Ex. Rel. Wacouta Township v. Brunkow Hardwood Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.