Legal Opinion
Dietsch v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 14, 1998No. CIV. A. 94-5400 (AJL)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This matter is currently before the court on the motion (the “Rule 60(b) Motion”) by the petitioner, Rafael Dietsch (“Dietseh”), for relief from a final judgment, pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 Specifically, Dietsch seeks relief from a 25 October 1995 opinion and order that denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition for a writ of habeas corpus (the “Habeas Petition”). 2
In the Rule 60(b) Motion, Dietsch argues he is entitled to relief because he asserts this court failed to address one of the issues raised in the Habeas Petition,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- In Re Ocsulis DorsainvilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Donald Burns v. Willis E. Morton, Superintendent Peter Verniero, the Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Calderon v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Bradshaw v. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Tischio v. Bontex, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Fadayiro v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- United States v. EnigweDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- United States v. HernandezDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2001
- Christian v. All Persons Claiming any Right, Title or Interest in all PropertiesDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.