Legal Opinion
United States v. Hernandez
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 13, 2001No. CR. A. 93-61-JJF, CIV. A. 97-227-JJFPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Motion For Relief From The November 19, 1998 Judgment Pursuant To Rule 60(b) Of Federal Rules of Civil Proc. [sic] (D.I.48) filed by Defendant, Gualberto Hernandez. By his Rule 60(b) Motion, Defendant requests the Court to reconsider its previous decision denying Defendant’s Motion To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct Sentence Pursuant To Title 28 U.S.C., Section 2255 (D.I.37). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Rule 60(b) Motion will be denied.
BACKGROUND
On January 5, 1994, Defendant pled guilty to two counts, Counts…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harold McQueen Jr. v. Gene Scroggy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Jessica T. And Halver L. Moolenaar v. Government of the Virgin Islands and Virgin Islands Port Authority. Appeal of Government of the Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Robert Rodriguez v. Robert Mitchell, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility, and Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Ross v. MeaganCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. EnigweDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Aird v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2004
- Harper v. VaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003