Legal Opinion
In Re Ocsulis Dorsainvil
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 15, 1997No. 96-8074PublishedCited by 751 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Chief Judge.
Ocsulis Dorsainvil has filed a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255 and 2244(b)(3)(A), as amended by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, seeking certification to file a second § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. After Dorsainvil’s first petition was denied on the merits, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bailey v. United States, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). Dorsainvil argues that Bailey renders his weapons conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) invalid and asks that this court certify…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by751 opinions
- United States v. Gerald WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- In Re James Davenport and Sherman NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Mario Lenardo Cradle v. United States of America, Ex Rel. John Miner, Warden, Allenwood Federal Prison CampCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Hernandez v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
746 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.