Elliott & Ten Eyck Partnership v. City of Long Beach
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, J.
A dispute arose between parties to a contract. Each sued the other. The contract had a dispute resolution provision, applicable to this dispute, by which each side would choose an expert, the two selected would choose a third, and the three would resolve the issue. The parties’ dispute ripened into litigation: A complaint and cross-complaint were filed. After these had pended in court for some time (with an unsuccessful effort to utilize the arbitration provision), the supervising judge suggested a solution. It was that the parties agree to have a sitting judge in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Marriage of AssemiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Cheng-Canindin v. Renaissance Hotel AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Severtson v. Williams Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mercury Insurance Group v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Sy First Family Ltd. Partnership v. CheungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Guseinov v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Hightower v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty.California Court of Appeal · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.