Legal Opinion
Hightower v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 2001No. B143841PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
In this writ proceeding, we examine the question of whether an arbitrator, in order to provide a proper remedy for the prevailing party, may resolve certain critical areas of a dispute in a “partial final award” but reserve jurisdiction to later decide, by a “final award,” issues which will likely arise as a result of the implementation of that remedy. In the specific factual context of this case, we answer that question in the affirmative.
Petitioner, Glenn Hightower (Hightower) seeks a writ of mandate compelling the superior court to either (1) vacate the “partial final…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Evans v. CENTERSTONE DEVELOPMENT CO.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Greenspan v. LADT, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Roehl v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.