Legal Opinion

Roth v. State Highway Commission of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1985No. 47442PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHAN, Judge.

Defendant State Highway Commission of Missouri appeals from the trial court’s granting of a motion for new trial on the ground that the verdict for defendant was against the weight of the evidence. Plaintiffs action against defendant is in the nature of a claim for inverse condemnation, in which plaintiff sought damages for the interference with the use of his property.

Plaintiff owned a tract of land of approximately 84 acres in St. Louis County located partially in the Village of Bel-Ridge and partially in the Village (now City) of St. John. This property was in the pathway of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Washington University Medical Center Redevelopment Corp. v. GaertnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. Wells v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  4. Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority of St. Louis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Fischer v. Famous-Barr Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tierney v. Planned Industrial Expansion Authority of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. Ehrlander v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Clay County Realty Co. v. City of GladstoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  4. Harris v. Missouri Department of ConservationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. EilersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API