State v. Deetz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The principal question presented on this appeal is whether this jurisdiction should adhere to the “common enemy” doctrine in respect to surface waters, or abandon it in favor of the “reasonable use” doctrine, as numerous other jurisdictions have done. Other subsidiary issues are raised on this appeal.
This action was brought by the state of Wisconsin against James E. and Patricia J. Deetz, the Wildwood Bluffs Estates Association, Inc., and the town of Dekorra, for the purpose of enjoining those defendants from permitting the deposit of materials in Lake Wisconsin and on adjacent roads, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Just v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Muench v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Keys v. RomleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Sorensen v. JarvisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Prah v. MarettiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Pendergrast v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. City of Oak CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.