Legal Opinion
Lingeman v. Shirk
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 1896No. 990PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Prom the Miami Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.
The appellant’s complaint is based upon the following written contract:
“In this contract, E.‘ H. Shirk is to deed John Lingeman, or order, 2,560 acres of land in Craighead county, Arkansas, or 3,840 acres in Poinsett county, he to select, taking the land in a body as nearly as he can, or, if he prefers, he may have land in the island, Clayton county, and allow me the difference in value between that and the Craighead county. The land to be selected out of any I may have in either county, when he comes down. Should he select in the island, T. B. Mills is to decide the difference in value. I am…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Greason v. . KeteltasNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Tewksbury v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Baldwin v. KerlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Board of Commissioners v. ShipleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Zimmerman v. ZehendnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Tiller v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Stekoll Petroleum Co. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Foltz v. EvansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. TennellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.