Legal Opinion

Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Tennell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1898No. 2,599PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Prom the Tipton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

— This cause was transferred to this court by' the Supreme Court. Appellants’ appeal from a judgment recovered against them fpr rents alleged to be due appellee on a gas lease. The errors assigned call in question the sufficiency of the complaint, striking out the cross-complaint of appellant, Diamond Plate Glass Company, and overruling the motion for a new trial. The questions argued call for a *133construction of the lease, and will be considered under the motion for a newítrial.

It is argued that the lease introduced in evidence does not contain-a sufficient description of the real estate…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Citizens' Fire Insurance, Security & Land Co. v. DollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  3. City of Vincennes v. Citizens' Gas Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Vinton v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Ketcham v. Brazil Block Coal Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1883

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. WOERNER, ETC. v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Merica v. BurgetIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Gardner v. CaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Cal Hirsch & Sons Iron & Rail Co. v. Peru Steel Casting Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Willian v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API