Legal Opinion
Goldlawr, Inc. v. Shubert
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 11, 1962PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALMIERI, District Judge.
This is a motion by plaintiff pursuant to Federal Rule 41(a) (2) for an order of voluntary dismissal of these anti-trust actions. Plaintiff originally instituted the actions against these and other defendants in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Defendants Select Operating Corporation and United Booking Office, Inc. there moved to dismiss on grounds of lack of in personam jurisdiction, and improper venue. Without ruling on the question of jurisdiction, the district court at Philadelphia held that venue was improper, but granted plaintiff’s motion to transfer the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Radovich v. National Football LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Straus v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- HOME OWNERS'LOAN CORPORATION v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Milton Lecompte v. Mr. Chip, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Esquivel v. ArauDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1996
- School Dist. of Philadelphia v. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Wainwright Securities Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Horton v. Trans World Airlines Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.