Legal Opinion
Straus v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 4, 1924No. 49PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMayer, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Prior to August 1, 1913, the Victor Company marketed its patented products throughout the United States through a system of sales contracts with its distributors and dealers by which it regulated the prices at which these products were resold to dealers and by dealers to the public and also prescribed the persons who were entitled to be established as dealers and to receive dealer’s discounts. Included in the 128 departments *794into which Macy’s was divided was the music department, known as No. 83, in which, with other articles, the goods of Victor Company…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. Hughes, and Hughes Tool Company and Raymond M. HollidayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- State of Illinois v. Sangamo Construction Co. And J. L. Simmons Company, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Copper Liquor, Inc., Robert Earl Basham, Jr., or the Estate of Harold Letcher, Deceased, Cross-Appellant v. Adolph Coors Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.