Legal Opinion

Radovich v. National Football League

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 8, 1957No. 94PublishedCited by 347 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

This action for treble damages and injunctive relief, brought under § 4 of the Clayton Act,1 tests the application of the antitrust laws to the business of professional football. Petitioner Radovich, an all-pro guard formerly with the Detroit Lions, contends that the respondents 2 *447entered into a conspiracy to monopolize and control organized professional football in the United States, in violation of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act; 3 that part of the conspiracy was to destroy the All-America Conference, a competitive professional football league in which Radovich once played; and that pursuant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by347 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007

342 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API