Radovich v. National Football League
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
This action for treble damages and injunctive relief, brought under § 4 of the Clayton Act,1 tests the application of the antitrust laws to the business of professional football. Petitioner Radovich, an all-pro guard formerly with the Detroit Lions, contends that the respondents 2 *447entered into a conspiracy to monopolize and control organized professional football in the United States, in violation of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act; 3 that part of the conspiracy was to destroy the All-America Conference, a competitive professional football league in which Radovich once played; and that pursuant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by347 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
342 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.