Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Hicks
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 27, 2009No. 200,606-0PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
214 P.3d 897 (2009)
In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST S. Richard HICKS, an Attorney at Law.
No. 200,606-0.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued June 9, 2009.
Decided August 27, 2009.
Scott G. Busby, Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, for Respondent.
ALEXANDER, C.J.
¶ 1 Attorney S. Richard Hicks appeals the recommendation of the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) Disciplinary Board (Board) that he be suspended from the practice of law for a period of 24 months. The WSBA also asks us to reject the Board's recommended sanction and disbar Hicks. We adopt the…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Matter of DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Van CampWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Van CampWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SimmerlyWashington Supreme Court · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.