Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Simmerly

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2012No. 200,983-2PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 The Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) charged Paul E. Simmerly with 36 counts of attorney misconduct stemming from his mishandling of client funds. The most egregious count involves making false representations and fabricating evidence during the disciplinary process. The hearing officer ultimately recommended suspension after finding that the WSBA had proved 26 of the 36 counts. On review, the WSBA Disciplinary Board (Board) affirmed the hearing officer’s findings but modified his decision in a few ways. First, it reinstated five counts involving the misuse of client funds based…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WhittWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against PooleWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against WhittWashington Supreme Court · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Proceeding against AbeleWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGrathWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Michael J. Pearce, WSB 7-4838Wyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. MatsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. MatsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API