Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Van Camp

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2011No. 200,811-9PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

257 P.3d 599 (2011)

171 Wash.2d 781

In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST W. Russell VAN CAMP, an Attorney at Law.

No. 200,811-9.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued March 8, 2011.

Decided June 16, 2011.

Dustin Douglass Deissner, Van Camp & Deissner, Spokane, WA, for Petitioner.

Joanne S. Abelson, Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

C. JOHNSON, J.

¶ 1 This attorney discipline case focuses on an ambiguous written fee agreement, the representation provided in the litigation, and the attorney's conduct during the grievance investigation. Attorney W.…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. State v. SwanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. RikerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Board of Professional Responsibility v. ReguliTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against ContehWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against StarczewskiWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SimmerlyWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGrathWashington Supreme Court · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API