Legal Opinion

Przymus v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 4, 1992No. C4-92-69PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

John B. Przymus was arrested for driving while under the influence and his driver’s license was revoked pursuant to the implied consent law. He petitioned for judicial review. The trial court sustained the revocation. Przymus appeals.

FACTS

Appellant’s driver’s license was revoked pursuant to the implied consent law and appellant challenged the revocation. An implied consent hearing was held to consider appellant’s challenge. At the hearing, appellant stipulated that on August 8, 1991 he was properly stopped by Officer Christopher Vincent, that Vincent had probable cause…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Tate v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Lampert Lumber Co. v. JoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Sigurdson v. Isanti CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zurich Reinsurance (UK) Ltd. v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Schulz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. State v. KarauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Dufloth v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Independent School District No. 404 v. CastorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API