Yuan v. Chow
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Armstrong, A.C.J.
Paul Yuan sued Ron Chow on a promissory note signed by Chow. Jesse Tam was joined as a third party defendant, and Yuan then made claim directly against Tam, alleging that Chow had signed the note on behalf of Tam. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Tam, ruling that the action was barred by the three-year statute of limitations governing oral agreements. The court also awarded Tam attorney’s fees. We reversed on the authority of Barnes v. McLendon, 128 Wn.2d 563, 910 P.2d 469 (1996). Both parties have asked us to reconsider and address an issue not argued to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Johnson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Overton v. Economic Assistance AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Vita Food Products, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Tomlinson v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Kaintz v. PLG, INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Kaintz v. PLG, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Dickens v. Alliance Analytical Laboratories, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.