Legal Opinion

Dickens v. Alliance Analytical Laboratories, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 10, 2005No. 23038-4-IIIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Following denied cross-motions for summary judgment, the parties received a stipulated order from the trial court certifying four questions for potential discretionary review:

Brown, J. —

1. What is the definition of an “agent” under RCW 49.52-.050, and what does a plaintiff have to prove in order to hold a defendant personally liable as an agent of an employer?

2. Is it enough that the purported agent have some power and authority to make decisions regarding the payment of wages, or must the purported agent have actually exercised such authority?

3. If actual exercise of authority is not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Meisel v. M & N Modern Hydraulic Press Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Durand v. HIMC CORP.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Durand v. HIMC Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Jumamil v. Lakeside Casino, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Columbia Asset Recovery Group, LLC v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. VALLEY/50TH AVE., LLC. v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API