Legal Opinion
Seacall Development, Ltd. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 1999No. B122382PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Seacall Development, Ltd. (Seacall) appeals from an order denying its motion to be relieved from a judgment of dismissal for failure to prosecute. We reverse and direct the trial court to grant the motion.
Facts and Proceedings Below
Seacall, a landlord, requested rent increases from respondent Santa Monica Rent Control Board (Board) for 11 of its condominium units.
In September 1994 Seacall, displeased with the amounts of the increases the Board allowed, filed a petition for a writ of administrative mandate. Seacall was represented before the Board and on the petition by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Carroll v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982
- Orange Empire National Bank v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Aldrich v. San Fernando Valley Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re BreulUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Bailey v. Rose CA6California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Blythe v. County of Riverside CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Panzino v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Panzino v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.