Legal Opinion

Panzino v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2000No. CV-99-0193-PRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

999 P.2d 198 (2000)

196 Ariz. 442

Laura J. PANZINO, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CITY OF PHOENIX, Defendant-Appellant.

Laura J. Panzino, a single woman, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

City of Phoenix, a municipal corporation, and Denise Katherine Karlin and John Doe Karlin, wife and husband, Defendants-Appellees.

No. CV-99-0193-PR.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

May 10, 2000.

Jones, Skelton & Hochuli by David C. Lewis, Phoenix, Attorneys for the City of Phoenix.

City of Phoenix by Stephen J. Craig, Phoenix, Attorneys for the City of Phoenix.

Jones, Skelton & Hochuli by Ronald W. Collett and Eileen J. Dennis,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Waifersong, Ltd. Inc. v. Classic Music Vending Harry H. Krouskoupf, Sr. Harry H. Krouskoupf, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  3. City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. United States v. 7108 West Grand Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, Feliberto Flores and Isabellita Flores, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API