Legal Opinion
Sa-Ag, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 17, 1989No. CX-89-972PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
On November 30, 1988, the Minnesota Department of Transportation issued a statement, entitled General Addendum A (the addendum), to all bidders on state contracts. The addendum purported to explain which haulers of sand, gravel or stone to state highway construction projects would have to adhere to prevailing wage and hourly rates. Claiming that this addendum was an interpretation of Minn.Stat. § 177.44, subd. 2 (1988), respondents asserted the addendum constituted a rule, the adoption of which is subject to the rulemak-ing procedures set forth in the Minnesota…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Cramond v. AFL-CIOSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Donovan Contracting of St. Cloud, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Michels v. KozitzaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- L & D Trucking v. Minnesota Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Faribault County v. Minnesota Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.