Legal Opinion

State v. Vasquez-Villagomez

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 2009No. CC 060733947; SC S055774; CC 060733949; SC S055775PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

In this aggravated murder case, the trial court concluded that the police did not have probable cause to arrest defendants without a warrant and granted defendants’ motion to suppress certain evidence obtained after their arrest. The state appeals directly to this court. ORS 138.060(2). For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the police had probable cause to arrest defendants and therefore reverse the trial court and remand for further proceedings.

We take the facts from the record and the trial court’s findings of fact. Defendants were arrested during the investigation of two east…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Devenpeck v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. HedgpethOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. BistrikaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API