Legal Opinion
Penrose v. Ross
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided May 22, 2003No. 20010943 CAPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENWOOD, Judge:
¶ 1 Nana Penrose (Penrose) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant, Bryant Ross (Ross), claiming error in the court’s determination that her amended complaint does not properly relate back to the original complaint. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 On November 17, 2000, just days prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations on her claim, Penrose filed a complaint for negligence (Original Complaint) against Christopher Ross (Father) and Does 1-5. In the Original Complaint, Penrose alleged that she was traveling southbound on 900 East when…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Attorney General of Utah v. PomeroyUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- DOXEY-LAYTON COMPANY v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1976
- Russell v. Standard Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1995
- Nunez v. AlboCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Monarrez v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- 2010-1 RADC/CADC Venture, LLC v. Dos Lagos, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Gary Porter Construction v. Fox Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2004
- Sanns v. Butterfield FordCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
- 2010-1 RADC/CADC Venture, LLC v. Dos Lagos, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.