Legal Opinion

DOXEY-LAYTON COMPANY v. Clark

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1976No. 14097PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Before us is an appeal of the judgment of the district court reforming a warranty deed, because of a scrivener’s mistake; quieting title to an undivided 25 per cent interest of the mineral estate, in plaintiffs; quieting title to an undivided 75 per cent interest of the mineral estate, in defendant individuals; and sustaining the leasehold interest of Chevron Oil Company in the entire mineral estate. We affirm.

Plaintiffs advance three points on appeal: (1) That the individual defendant’s claim of mistake was barred by a statute of limitation, and that the doctrine of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MerrillOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Naisbitt v. HodgesUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Blumenthal v. LiebmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Thompson v. BantzMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Phillips v. PittsWashington Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Perry v. Pioneer Wholesale Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Nunez v. AlboCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  3. Wilcox v. Geneva Rock Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. Egeland v. City CouncilMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Vina v. Jefferson Insurance Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API