DOXEY-LAYTON COMPANY v. Clark
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice:
Before us is an appeal of the judgment of the district court reforming a warranty deed, because of a scrivener’s mistake; quieting title to an undivided 25 per cent interest of the mineral estate, in plaintiffs; quieting title to an undivided 75 per cent interest of the mineral estate, in defendant individuals; and sustaining the leasehold interest of Chevron Oil Company in the entire mineral estate. We affirm.
Plaintiffs advance three points on appeal: (1) That the individual defendant’s claim of mistake was barred by a statute of limitation, and that the doctrine of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lewis v. MerrillOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Naisbitt v. HodgesUtah Supreme Court · 1957
- Blumenthal v. LiebmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Thompson v. BantzMontana Supreme Court · 1959
- Phillips v. PittsWashington Supreme Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Perry v. Pioneer Wholesale Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
- Nunez v. AlboCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- Wilcox v. Geneva Rock Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Egeland v. City CouncilMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Vina v. Jefferson Insurance Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.