Legal Opinion
Attorney General of Utah v. Pomeroy
Utah Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1937No. 5669PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Justice.
The Attorney General filed, on April 14,1934, a complaint against the receiver of the.White Star Gas & Oil Company, Jack W. T. Pomeroy, Clara Pomeroy, his wife, and the Star-lene Gas & Oil Company, the object of which was to collect, under authority of section 57-12-11, R. S. Utah 1933, a gasoline tax imposed by chapter 39, Laws of Utah 1923, as amended and carried into chapter 12, title 57, R. S. Utah 1933 (57-12-1 et seq.), on the sale or use of motor fuels and alleged to be owing the State. The complaint is long and, as needed, we shall quote parts of it in considering the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- McLish v. RoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Luxton v. North River Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hill v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Wells v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
- Kennecott Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Hackes v. HackesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- McGuire v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.