Legal Opinion

Burcham v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 7, 1963No. 50948PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Plaintiff, while riding in an automobile owned and driven by Bay Navrkal, received injuries in a collision with a car owned by one Beacom. The Beacom ear and driver were uninsured. Navrkal carried-insurance with Surety National Insurance Company (Surety). Surety’s policy provided uninsured motorist coverage. Surety has settled its liability with plaintiff for $3700. Its policy limit for injuries to any one person is $5000.

Plaintiff’s father has three policies, identical for our purpose, with defendant, Farmers Insurance Exchange (Exchange), each provides uninsured motorist coverage. The limit…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Oregon Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. American Automobile Insurance Co. v. Republic Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  3. August A. Busch & Co. of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Jarrett v. AllState InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Peerless Casualty Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Putnam v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Wescott v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. Moore v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company GroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API