Legal Opinion
Pauline v. Fitzpatrick
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 7, 1957No. Civ. No. 17593PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Motion by respondents to dismiss appeal on ground of failure of appellants to file opening brief. Motion by appellants to stay appeal.
A complete history of the proceedings in this matter is set forth in Estate of Doran, No. 17513, this day decided (see Estate of Doran, ante, p. 230 [316 P.2d 83].)
For the reasons set forth in said decision the motion to stay appeal is denied and the motion to dismiss is granted.
Peters, P. J., and Wood (Fred B.), J., concurred.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Miller v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3Cited by81 opinions
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Signal Companies, Inc. v. Harbor Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Northern Insurance Company of New York, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Allied Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. USF InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2008
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.