Legal Opinion
Bartlette v. Hyatt Regency
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 25, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2013-1640PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Leroy Bartlette was employed by the defendant Hyatt Regency (“Hyatt”) for over twenty years before his termination. He alleges that he suffered dis-' crimination during his employment and that he was terminated for discriminatory reasons. Before the Court is Hyatt’s Motion to Dismiss. (“Motion”) (ECF No. 13). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will GRANT the motion in part and DENY the motion in part.
A. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Bartlette was employed as an Assistant Server in a restaurant located in the Washington,…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Menoken v. McGettiganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Breen v. MinetaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Williams v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Achoe v. ClaytonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Brigida v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.