Legal Opinion

Torrington Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 14, 1997No. Consolidated Court No. 95-03-00351PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge:

Plaintiff and defendant-intervenor The Torrington Company (“Torrington”) moves this Court pursuant to Rule 56.2 of the Rules of this Court for judgment on the agency record challenging aspects of the final determination of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“Commerce”), of the fourth administrative review of antifriction bearings (“AFBs”) from Singapore, entitled Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From France, et al.; Final Results of Anti-dumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Partial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  4. The Timken Company v. The United States, and China National MacHinery and Equipment Import and Export CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coalition for the Preservation of American Brake Drum & Rotor Aftermarket Manufacturers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  2. SNR Roulements v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  3. Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  4. Saarstahl Ag v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  5. Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API