Torrington Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Tsoucalas, Judge:
Plaintiff, The Torrington Company (“Torring-ton”), commenced this action to challenge certain aspects of the Depart*968ment of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“ITA”) final results in the first administrative review of imports of antifriction bearings from Sweden. Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From Sweden; Final Results of Antidump-ing Duty Administrative Reviews (“FinalResults”), 56 Fed. Reg. 31,762 (1991). Substantive issues raised by the parties in the underlying administrative proceeding were addressed by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- INA Walzlager Schaeffler KG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- AL Tech Specialty Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.