Legal Opinion
Saarstahl Ag v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 5, 1997No. Slip Op. 97-147. Court No. 93-04-00219PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the Department of Commerce’s (“Department” or “Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand Regarding the Privatization in Germany, Saarstahl AG v. United States, Consol. Ct. No. 93-04-00219 {“Final Results ”). The Final Results address the issue of whether Saarstahl Volkingen GmbH (“Saarstahl” or “Saarstahl SVK”) was creditworthy in 1989, a year in which the company benefitted from government and private bank debt forgiveness.
Plaintiff argues the Department’s decision in the Final Results is unsupported by substantial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Saarstahl Ag v. United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant, and Inland Steel Bar Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999