Legal Opinion
United States v. Morgan
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 21, 1994No. 3:93 CR 00212 (TFGD)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR DISCLOSURE OF GRAND JURY MINUTES
DALY, District Judge.
In this prosecution for misapplication of bank funds and bank fraud the defendant Michael G. Morgan (“Morgan”) moves to dismiss the indictment, or a portion thereof, on three grounds. Morgan claims that the indictment (1) violates his Fifth Amendment right against double jeopardy; (2) relies on an unconstitutional ten-year statute of limitations period and exceeds the applicable five-year statute of limitations period; and (3) is the result of improper and excessive use of hearsay testimony.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. FrazerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- United States v. TeyiboDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- United States v. KufrovichDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- United States v. BuntyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- United States v. Loc Tien NguyenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.