Legal Opinion
Beazell v. Ohio
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 23, 1925No. 247, 248PublishedCited by 887 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
Plaintiffs in error were jointly indicted in the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, Ohio, for the crime of embezzlement, a felony. On February 13, 1923, the date of the offense as charged, Ohio General Code, § 13,677, provided: “When two or more persons are jointly indicted for a felony, on application to the court for that purpose, each shall be separately tried.” In April of the same year, before the indictment, which was returned on October 25, this section was amended (110 Ohio Laws, 301) so as to provide:
“ When two or more persons are jointly indicted for a felony, except a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by887 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
882 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.