Legal Opinion

Sykes v. Austin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 22, 1938No. 27891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

C. F. Sullivan owned a tract of land.. It was subject to an oil and gas lease whereunder he was to receive, the usual one-eighth of oil and gas produced and saved, as royalty. He made an agreement with C. E. Sykes, the present defendant, to sell Mr. Sykes one-half of said one-eighth royalty, and a short memorandum of the agreement was made in writing, Sullivan later to execute the formal conveyance. Sullivan then refused to perform the agreement, and an action for specific performance was brought against him by Sykes. Sykes was successful in said action, the trial court’s judgment, as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Carroll v. BowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Wilson v. OlsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Breeding v. RitterhoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Dixon v. MapesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Duvall v. StoneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Melton v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Swearingen v. OldhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Meeks v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Texaco, Inc. v. PigottDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API