Legal Opinion
Niccum v. Enquist
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 1, 2009No. 27504-3-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
215 P.3d 987 (2009)
Jeffery W. NICCUM, a married man, Respondent,
v.
Ryan L. ENQUIST, Individually and the marital community composed of he and his wife, if any, Appellant.
No. 27504-3-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
September 1, 2009.
Jerry T. Dyreson, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
David Lawrence Force, Carlson McMahon & Sealby PLLC, Wenatchee, WA, Marilee C. Erickson, Michael Neil Budelsky, Reed McClure, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
KULIK, J.
¶ 1 The question presented here is whether the trial court erred by subtracting costs and attorney fees from an offer of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WestlingWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. WestlingWashington Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Niccum v. EnquistWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Stedman v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- In the Matter of the Estate of Joseph R. Wilcock (Wilcock v. Wilcock)Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Pr Of The Estate Of Robert E. Carpine, App./cross-resp. v. Christa Mckillop, Resp./cross-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Monnastes v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012