Legal Opinion

Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1997No. 64678-3PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

— Fireside, Inc. obtained review of a decision by Division One of the Court of Appeals in which that court reversed the King County Superior Court’s denial of a request by the respondents, Cory Nevers and Steven Anderson, for a trial de novo of a civil action that had previously been transferred to mandatory arbitration. The primary issue before us is whether it is fatal to Nevers and Anderson’s request for a trial de novo that they failed to file proof, within 20 days of the date an arbitration award in favor of Fireside was filed, that they had served Fireside with a copy of the request. We…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. WittenbargerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City of Seattle v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Perkins Coie v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In the Matter of CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API