Legal Opinion

Brookes v. City of Oakland

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1911No. S.F. No. 5895PublishedCited by 30 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. T. W. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action by the plaintiff, on behalf of

himself and others as taxpayers within a certain part of the city of Oakland, described as Sewer District No. 1, to enjoin the issuance and sale of certain bonds of the city of Oakland to be paid by a special tax upon the property within the district. Defendant had judgment in the court below and the plaintiff appeals.

The bonds have been authorized by proceedings taken under the act of February 13, 1911, [Stats. 1911, p. 40], providing for the creation of sewer districts in cities, the constraction of sewers therein, the issuing of bonds to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Parsons v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Thain v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API