People v. Forney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chambers, J.), dated October 17, 2003, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court failed to set forth “the findings of fact and conclusions of law” upon which its risk assessment determination was made, as required by Correction Law § 168-n (3). However, this Court may make its own findings of fact and conclusions of law, where, as here, the record is sufficient to do so (see People v…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. DexterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. HinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. VenturaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. VillaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. SanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. PardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. PietarnielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. BanksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.