People v. Banks
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), dated March 7, 2006, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The risk assessment instrument prepared in connection with the defendant’s redetermination hearing assessed him a total of 130 points, and no departure was recommended. Following…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- People v. ForneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. VillaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. PerserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. PensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. UrbanskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. GuitardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. BoykinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. LyonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.