Legal Opinion
People v. Pietarniello
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 1, 2008PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), dated October 5, 2006, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level *476pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court failed to set forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which its risk assessment determination was made, as required by Correction Law § 168-n…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. ForneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. WilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. MontalvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. HowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. ShephardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.