People v. Pardo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appealby the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hollie, J.), dated November 14, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Although the Supreme Court failed to set forth “the findings of fact and conclusions of law” upon which its risk assessment determination was made, as required by Correction Law § 168-n (3), this Court may make its own findings of fact and conclusions of law, where, as here, the record is sufficient to do so (see…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. GuamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. ForneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. DubuqueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. UrbanskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. GuitardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. VegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. HewittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.