Legal Opinion

Convalescent Services, Inc. v. Schultz

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided May 16, 1996No. 14-94-01198-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

This appeal concerns the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury’s findings of gross negligence and punitive damages. In addition to eight points of error attacking the legal sufficiency of the evidence, appellant, Convalescent Services, Inc., d/b/a Bayou Glen Nursing Home (“Bayou Glen”) complains in four additional points that it was denied substantive and procedural due process by the trial court’s failure to comply with the standards set forth in Transportation Ins. Co. v. Moriel, 879 S.W.2d 10 (Tex.1994). We affirm.

After hospitalization for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lesikar v. Rappeport, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  2. Seelbach v. Clubb, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  3. NOWZARADAN v. Ryans, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  4. Castellanos v. Littlejohn, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  5. Rivas v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API