Legal Opinion

Castellanos v. Littlejohn

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided April 16, 1997No. 04-97-00072-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN, Justice.

The Castellanos inadvertently designated Dr. Perez, a consulting expert, as a testifying expert witness as a result of a clerical error. Later, after the Castellanos attempted to “de-designate” Dr. Perez as a testifying expert and instead name him as a consulting expert, the trial court granted Kroger’s motion to compel discovery from Dr. Perez. The Castellanos now seek a writ of mandamus to require that this order compelling discovery be withdrawn. We conditionally grant the writ because, as a consulting expert, Dr. Perez’s “identity, mental impressions and opinions,” “any…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Transport Insurance Co. v. FairclothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Loftin v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Fifty-Six Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars in U.S. Currency v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility Rates v. Public Utility Commission of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. White v. Vanderbilt UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. In Re Doctor's Hosp. of Laredo, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  4. Rendon v. AvanceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Lopez v. Martin, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API