Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Chief Justice.
This is a products liability case in which the plaintiffs William C. Kindred and Ernest J. Kurtz pleaded strict liability on both a design defect theory and a marketing defect theory. The trial judge submitted special issues only on the marketing defect. After the jury answered the special issues on marketing defect in the negative, the trial court rendered a take nothing judgment. The court of appeals affirmed. 644 S.W.2d 828 (Tex.App. — Corpus Christi 1982). We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to the trial court for a new trial.
A…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Seideneck v. Cal Bayreuther AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Boatland of Houston, Inc. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Turner v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,604 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Ford Motor Co. v. RidgwayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TamezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
1,599 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.